How is that aesthetically pleasing?

Posted by on Dec 14, 2009 | 3 comments

image

Please ignore the missing filename error.

This eyesore is in Mississauga near my parents’ house in an otherwise low-rise neighbourhood.  How is this aesthetically pleasing. 

3 Comments

  1. Well the housing carbon footprint of all those residents is probably considerably lower than that of all those people living in the pretty boxes made of tiki taki.

    • @rww,
      True that. But there’s got to be a better way of achieving both (aesthetics and environmnt).

  2. I would argue the carbon footprint is higher in this energy in-efficient buildign. Probably built +30 years ago with no consideration to upgrade as a homeowner would. I am also advised that some condo / apt dwellers do not have to pay for utilities, therefore, no incetive to reduce.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>